PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSPX vs. FLCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSPX vs. FLCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSPX achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than FLCGX's 8.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLSPX having a 10.86% annualized return and FLCGX not far behind at 10.62%.


FLSPX

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.27%
YTD
11.01%
6M
11.51%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
10.86%

FLCGX

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.88%
YTD
8.59%
6M
8.37%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSPX vs. FLCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
11.01%16.15%27.96%14.00%-11.49%20.56%-0.23%13.03%-3.96%19.30%
FLCGX
Meeder Quantex Fund
8.59%19.10%36.38%14.81%-13.77%27.27%-5.36%18.48%-12.35%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSPX and FLCGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2015

0.84

The correlation between FLSPX and FLCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSPX vs. FLCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSPX
FLSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FLSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCGX
FLCGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FLCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSPX vs. FLCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSPXFLCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.75

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.21

11.85

+2.37

FLSPX vs. FLCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FLCGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSPX and FLCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSPXFLCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.00

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.51

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.45

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.37

+0.35

Drawdowns

FLSPX vs. FLCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSPX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum FLCGX drawdown of -66.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSPX and FLCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSPXFLCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.07%

-66.94%

+39.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-8.86%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-17.47%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.01%

-32.83%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.07%

-50.45%

+23.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.70%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-12.88%

+7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.05%

-0.03%

Volatility

FLSPX vs. FLCGX - Volatility Comparison

Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) have volatilities of 3.35% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSPXFLCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

3.27%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

9.33%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

12.22%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

22.38%

-9.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

23.47%

-9.84%

FLSPX vs. FLCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSPX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCGX's 1.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSPX vs. FLCGX - Dividend Comparison

FLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than FLCGX's 7.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCGX
Meeder Quantex Fund
7.77%8.48%39.58%1.17%2.73%16.70%0.53%0.67%0.00%2.92%2.00%17.06%
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
4.08%4.32%17.39%8.41%2.81%5.55%0.09%0.96%1.26%6.78%2.52%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FLSPX and FLCGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLSPX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to FLCGX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSPX dropped -27.07% vs FLCGX's -66.94%.

FLSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSPX and FLCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer