PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSP vs. MMSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSP vs. MMSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSP achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than MMSD's 1.45% return.


FLSP

1D
0.51%
1M
0.58%
6M
3.31%
YTD
3.20%
1Y
19.30%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*

MMSD

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.09%
6M
1.09%
YTD
1.45%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSP vs. MMSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLSP and MMSD is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSP vs. MMSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSP
FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MMSD
MMSD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MMSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSP vs. MMSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLSPMMSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

2.88

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.40

10.96

+3.43

FLSP vs. MMSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSP Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the MMSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSP and MMSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLSP vs. MMSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSP drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, which is greater than MMSD's maximum drawdown of -1.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSP and MMSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSPMMSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.75%

-1.35%

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-1.35%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.28%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-0.21%

-6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

0.35%

+0.99%

Volatility

FLSP vs. MMSD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD) at 0.52%. This indicates that FLSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSPMMSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

0.52%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

1.48%

+5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.84%

1.77%

+7.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

1.75%

+11.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.45%

1.75%

+11.70%

FLSP vs. MMSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MMSD's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSP vs. MMSD - Dividend Comparison

FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than MMSD's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.57%2.65%1.18%1.19%2.18%1.19%8.08%
MMSD
NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF
3.56%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSP and MMSD have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSP has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to MMSD (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSP dropped -22.75% vs MMSD's -1.35%.

On 1-year performance, FLSP leads with 19.30% vs 3.87% for MMSD. On fees, MMSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MMSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLSP has performed better with a 19.30% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FLSP.

MMSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.57% for FLSP.

FLSP is categorized as Long-Short, while MMSD is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and NYLI. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FLSP and 0.25% for MMSD.

MMSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSP and MMSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer