PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSP vs. LSEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSP vs. LSEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSP achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than LSEQ's 28.71% return.


FLSP

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.97%
6M
2.01%
1Y
14.58%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*

LSEQ

1D
-1.44%
1M
4.89%
YTD
28.71%
6M
26.95%
1Y
29.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSP vs. LSEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
1.97%15.56%11.75%-2.38%
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
28.71%4.13%12.80%-1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSP and LSEQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2023

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSP vs. LSEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSP
FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

LSEQ
LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSP vs. LSEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLSPLSEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

4.03

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

12.66

-1.84

FLSP vs. LSEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the LSEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSP and LSEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLSP vs. LSEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSP drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, which is greater than LSEQ's maximum drawdown of -8.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSP and LSEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSPLSEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.75%

-8.35%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-7.40%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-1.44%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-3.19%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.35%

-0.96%

Volatility

FLSP vs. LSEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) is 1.79%, while Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that FLSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSPLSEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

5.46%

-3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

13.34%

-6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

15.50%

-6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.35%

14.46%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.48%

14.46%

-0.98%

FLSP vs. LSEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LSEQ's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSP vs. LSEQ - Dividend Comparison

FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than LSEQ's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.60%2.65%1.18%1.19%2.18%1.19%8.08%
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
1.71%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSP and LSEQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSEQ has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to FLSP (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSP dropped -22.75% vs LSEQ's -8.35%.

On 1-year performance, LSEQ leads with 29.70% vs 14.58% for FLSP. On fees, FLSP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FLSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LSEQ has performed better with a 29.70% return vs 14.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLSP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

FLSP has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.71% for LSEQ.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FLSP and 1.70% for LSEQ.

LSEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSP and LSEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer