PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSHX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSHX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund (FLSHX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSHX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FLSHX has outperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.


FLSHX

1D
0.34%
1M
4.73%
YTD
10.26%
6M
11.02%
1Y
24.42%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
10.46%

FRQIX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.53%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.28%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
4.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSHX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLSHX
Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund
10.26%19.16%13.73%17.66%-16.84%16.35%15.32%21.68%-6.82%18.88%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
4.05%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%12.63%-2.84%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSHX and FRQIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.82

The correlation between FLSHX and FRQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSHX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSHX
FLSHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSHX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund (FLSHX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSHXFRQIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

2.53

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

3.73

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.07

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.54

13.08

+0.46

FLSHX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSHX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSHXFRQIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.53

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.53

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.94

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.56

+0.02

Drawdowns

FLSHX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSHX drawdown since its inception was -36.65%, roughly equal to the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSHX and FRQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSHXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.65%

-38.01%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-3.43%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

-5.21%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.65%

-17.04%

-19.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.65%

-17.04%

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-4.43%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.80%

+1.03%

Volatility

FLSHX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund (FLSHX) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.66%. This indicates that FLSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSHXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

1.66%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.24%

3.42%

+4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

4.15%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

5.57%

+12.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

5.33%

+10.74%

FLSHX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSHX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSHX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

FLSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than FRQIX's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSHX
Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund
5.66%6.40%3.27%2.66%4.16%23.09%3.21%2.60%4.75%2.02%1.63%2.98%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.04%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSHX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSHX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to FRQIX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSHX dropped -36.65% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSHX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer