FLRZX vs. JRLVX
FLRZX (Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund) and JRLVX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FLRZX returned 8.54%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for JRLVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FLRZX charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JRLVX.
Performance
FLRZX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRZX achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FLRZX has underperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 8.54%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.
FLRZX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
JRLVX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
FLRZX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRZX Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund | 7.81% | 16.43% | 11.09% | 15.27% | -16.31% | 13.26% | 11.68% | 19.21% | -6.08% | 16.98% |
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio | 11.90% | 19.25% | 14.50% | 18.00% | -18.06% | 18.45% | 16.23% | 25.03% | -8.29% | 17.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRZX and JRLVX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FLRZX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLRZX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank
FLRZX
JRLVX
FLRZX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund (FLRZX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLRZX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 3.17 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.51 | 14.06 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLRZX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.39 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.63 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.71 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.65 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
FLRZX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRZX drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRZX and JRLVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRZX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.74% | -32.53% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -8.50% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.46% | -15.27% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -25.64% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.74% | -32.53% | +1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.38% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -4.56% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.91% | -0.36% |
Volatility
FLRZX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund (FLRZX) is 2.59%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that FLRZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLRZX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 3.33% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.86% | 8.98% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.38% | 11.29% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.23% | 14.77% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 15.98% | -3.45% |
FLRZX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRZX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLRZX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison
FLRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRZX Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund | 5.31% | 5.73% | 2.70% | 2.25% | 3.94% | 14.55% | 2.75% | 2.97% | 3.79% | 2.00% | 1.89% | 3.03% |
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio | 3.18% | 3.55% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 8.03% | 6.00% | 4.26% | 8.99% | 10.96% | 4.29% | 3.40% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, FLRZX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JRLVX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FLRZX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRZX dropped -30.74% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.
JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLRZX and JRLVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer