PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRN vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRN vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRN achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.


FLRN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
6M
2.18%
YTD
2.32%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
3.05%

SBIT

1D
5.38%
1M
1.44%
6M
58.27%
YTD
44.00%
1Y
124.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRN vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLRN and SBIT is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRN vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRN
FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRN vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLRNSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+10.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.18

1.25

+1.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.52

2.60

+17.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

121.58

5.92

+115.66

FLRN vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRN Sharpe Ratio is 6.75, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRN and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLRN vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRN drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRN and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRNSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-91.35%

+76.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.23%

-47.94%

+47.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-77.15%

+77.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-68.83%

+67.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

21.04%

-21.00%

Volatility

FLRN vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) is 0.17%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that FLRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRNSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.17%

22.98%

-22.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.54%

68.89%

-68.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69%

88.51%

-87.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.69%

96.89%

-95.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

96.89%

-92.69%

FLRN vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRN vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

FLRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than SBIT's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRN
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
4.44%4.89%5.67%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.97%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRN and SBIT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to FLRN (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRN dropped -14.64% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 4.65% for FLRN. On fees, FLRN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLRN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

FLRN has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 3.97% for SBIT.

FLRN is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. FLRN tracks Bloomberg U.S. Dollar Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLRN and 0.95% for SBIT.

FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.75 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRN and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer