FLRN vs. QCON

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON).

FLRN and QCON are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLRN is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Nov 30, 2011. QCON is an actively managed fund by American Century. It was launched on Feb 16, 2021.

Performance

FLRN vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLRN vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	0.25%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

Returns By Period

FLRN

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 5.86%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 2.98%

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRN vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

QCON

American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF

FLRN

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF

Return for Risk

FLRN vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRN

FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRN vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLRN	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.05	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLRN	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	—	—

Dividends

FLRN vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

FLRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.65%	4.89%	5.67%	5.68%	1.95%	0.39%	1.22%	2.76%	2.39%	1.64%	1.06%	0.63%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FLRN vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRN drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRN and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRN	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.64%	0.00%	-14.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	0.00%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	0.00%	-1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLRN	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82%	0.00%	+1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.69%	0.00%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.21%	0.00%	+4.21%