PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRN vs. BBCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRN vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRN achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.82% return.


FLRN

1D
0.03%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.19%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
3.03%

BBCB

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.82%
6M
2.66%
1Y
8.37%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRN vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
1.87%5.01%6.32%6.54%1.31%0.39%0.77%4.02%0.06%
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
2.82%7.69%1.97%8.42%-15.72%-2.23%10.39%14.86%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRN and BBCB is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRN vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRN
FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BBCB
BBCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRN vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRNBBCBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

7.18

1.71

+5.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

13.18

2.79

+10.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.44

1.34

+2.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

21.54

2.85

+18.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

130.06

10.09

+119.98

FLRN vs. BBCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRN Sharpe Ratio is 7.18, which is higher than the BBCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRN and BBCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRNBBCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.18

1.71

+5.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.50

0.12

+2.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.46

+0.04

Drawdowns

FLRN vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRN drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRN and BBCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRNBBCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-22.48%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.23%

-2.95%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.43%

-6.46%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.16%

-22.32%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-6.66%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.83%

-0.79%

Volatility

FLRN vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) is 0.15%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that FLRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRNBBCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

1.41%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

3.98%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68%

4.93%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.69%

7.25%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

7.50%

-3.30%

FLRN vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLRN vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison

FLRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than BBCB's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
7.15%5.02%5.22%4.22%3.39%3.47%4.59%5.25%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
4.51%4.89%5.67%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRN and BBCB have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBCB has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to FLRN (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRN dropped -14.64% vs BBCB's -22.48%.

On 5-year performance, FLRN leads with 4.19% vs 0.84% for BBCB. On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLRN has performed better with a 4.19% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLRN.

BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 4.51% for FLRN.

FLRN tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y), while BBCB tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLRN and 0.09% for BBCB.

FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.18 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRN and BBCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer