PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRLX vs. FFTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRLX vs. FFTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRLX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than FFTHX's 9.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLRLX having a 10.99% annualized return and FFTHX not far behind at 10.61%.


FLRLX

1D
0.31%
1M
2.36%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.66%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
10.99%

FFTHX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.16%
YTD
9.94%
6M
10.93%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRLX vs. FFTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLRLX
Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund
10.96%20.46%14.99%18.90%-17.36%17.28%16.02%22.52%-7.14%19.04%
FFTHX
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund
9.94%19.16%11.03%17.67%-17.67%14.44%17.14%24.49%-8.40%20.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRLX and FFTHX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2015

0.96

The correlation between FLRLX and FFTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRLX vs. FFTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRLX
FLRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FLRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FFTHX
FFTHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRLX vs. FFTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRLXFFTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.05

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

13.33

-0.29

FLRLX vs. FFTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FFTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRLX and FFTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRLXFFTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.37

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.62

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.79

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.50

+0.11

Drawdowns

FLRLX vs. FFTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRLX drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, smaller than the maximum FFTHX drawdown of -52.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRLX and FFTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRLXFFTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-52.86%

+16.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-7.52%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-11.60%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.66%

-25.94%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.66%

-28.81%

-7.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.16%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-6.95%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.72%

+0.27%

Volatility

FLRLX vs. FFTHX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRLXFFTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.35%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

7.99%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

9.69%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

12.40%

+5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

13.52%

+2.86%

FLRLX vs. FFTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRLX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTHX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRLX vs. FFTHX - Dividend Comparison

FLRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than FFTHX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFTHX
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund
5.86%5.03%2.75%1.86%11.21%11.62%5.93%6.75%7.66%3.17%4.00%5.97%
FLRLX
Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund
6.07%6.74%3.17%2.49%4.28%21.72%4.14%3.20%6.45%2.33%2.44%4.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FLRLX and FFTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFTHX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to FLRLX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRLX dropped -36.66% vs FFTHX's -52.86%.

FFTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRLX and FFTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer