PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRLX vs. FFSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRLX vs. FFSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRLX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than FFSFX's 12.07% return.


FLRLX

1D
2.02%
1M
-0.37%
6M
6.22%
YTD
9.29%
1Y
20.61%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
10.74%
ALL TIME*
9.33%

FFSFX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.16%
6M
7.96%
YTD
12.07%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLRLX vs. FFSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLRLX
Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund
9.29%20.46%14.99%18.90%-17.36%17.28%16.02%7.96%
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
12.07%23.76%14.01%20.54%-18.28%16.54%18.08%9.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRLX and FFSFX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FLRLX and FFSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRLX vs. FFSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLRLX
FLRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FLRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSFX
FFSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLRLX vs. FFSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLRLXFFSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.34

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.01

9.78

-0.77

FLRLX vs. FFSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FFSFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRLX and FFSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLRLX vs. FFSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRLX drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, which is greater than FFSFX's maximum drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRLX and FFSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRLXFFSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-31.03%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-9.79%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-15.43%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.66%

-27.31%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-2.51%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-5.81%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.34%

-0.23%

Volatility

FLRLX vs. FFSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) is 3.82%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that FLRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRLXFFSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.45%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

12.45%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

14.46%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

15.29%

+2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

17.07%

-0.69%

FLRLX vs. FFSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRLX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSFX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRLX vs. FFSFX - Dividend Comparison

FLRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, more than FFSFX's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
4.99%3.69%2.29%2.01%8.77%7.81%2.25%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLRLX
Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund
6.14%6.74%3.17%2.49%4.28%21.72%4.14%3.20%6.45%2.33%2.44%4.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FLRLX and FFSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSFX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to FLRLX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRLX dropped -36.66% vs FFSFX's -31.03%.

FFSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRLX and FFSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer