FLRHX vs. JLKYX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FLRHX (Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund) and JLKYX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FLRHX returned 9.64%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for JLKYX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FLRHX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JLKYX.

Performance

FLRHX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRHX achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than JLKYX's 12.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FLRHX has underperformed JLKYX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while JLKYX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.

FLRHX

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 8.88%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 21.91%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.64%

JLKYX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 12.10%
• 1Y: 28.63%
• 3Y*: 18.44%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRHX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLRHX Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund	8.88%	17.87%	12.52%	16.53%	-16.51%	14.44%	13.73%	20.72%	-6.67%	18.24%
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	12.46%	20.04%	15.41%	18.53%	-18.04%	18.38%	16.13%	25.07%	-8.32%	17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRHX and JLKYX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2015	0.96

The correlation between FLRHX and JLKYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLRHX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRHX

FLRHX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FLRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FLRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FLRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FLRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FLRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

JLKYX

JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 68
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRHX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLRHX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.22	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.02	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.40	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	3.09	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.46	13.41	-0.95

FLRHX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRHX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLRHX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRHX drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, roughly equal to the maximum JLKYX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRHX and JLKYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRHX	JLKYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.23%	-32.55%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.64%	-9.16%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.86%	-16.11%	+4.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.23%	-25.75%	-7.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.23%	-32.55%	-0.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.42%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-4.65%	-2.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	2.11%	-0.37%

Volatility

FLRHX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) is 3.98%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that FLRHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRHX	JLKYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	5.11%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.33%	10.57%	-2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.89%	12.77%	-2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	15.34%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.93%	16.26%	-2.33%

FLRHX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRHX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLRHX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

FLRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than JLKYX's 3.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRHX Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund	6.59%	7.46%	3.01%	2.83%	4.09%	18.13%	3.89%	3.94%	6.43%	2.24%	2.54%	5.76%
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	3.21%	3.61%	1.77%	2.16%	8.08%	5.71%	3.88%	8.54%	10.69%	4.33%	3.23%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRHX and JLKYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FLRHX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLRHX or JLKYX?

JLKYX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to FLRHX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRHX dropped -33.23% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.