PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRHX vs. FRQKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRHX vs. FRQKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRHX achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than FRQKX's 3.92% return.


FLRHX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.84%
6M
9.55%
1Y
21.74%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
9.52%

FRQKX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.35%
YTD
3.92%
6M
4.30%
1Y
10.00%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRHX vs. FRQKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLRHX
Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund
8.84%17.87%12.52%16.53%-16.51%14.44%13.73%6.84%
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
3.92%9.91%4.42%8.62%-12.30%3.95%9.68%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRHX and FRQKX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.79

The correlation between FLRHX and FRQKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRHX vs. FRQKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRHX
FLRHX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQKX
FRQKX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FRQKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRHX vs. FRQKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRHXFRQKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.48

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.91

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

12.38

+0.26

FLRHX vs. FRQKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FRQKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRHX and FRQKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRHXFRQKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.40

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.51

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.77

-0.15

Drawdowns

FLRHX vs. FRQKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRHX drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, which is greater than FRQKX's maximum drawdown of -16.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRHX and FRQKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRHXFRQKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.23%

-16.97%

-16.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-3.42%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-5.17%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.23%

-16.97%

-16.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.17%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-3.86%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.80%

+0.91%

Volatility

FLRHX vs. FRQKX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) at 1.65%. This indicates that FLRHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRHXFRQKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

1.65%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

3.42%

+4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.33%

4.17%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

5.56%

+9.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

5.76%

+8.14%

FLRHX vs. FRQKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRHX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQKX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRHX vs. FRQKX - Dividend Comparison

FLRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than FRQKX's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRHX
Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund
6.85%7.46%3.01%2.83%4.09%18.13%3.89%3.94%6.43%2.24%2.54%5.76%
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
3.23%3.09%2.91%2.86%5.12%6.11%3.61%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRHX and FRQKX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLRHX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to FRQKX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRHX dropped -33.23% vs FRQKX's -16.97%.

FRQKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRHX and FRQKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer