FLRHX vs. EMO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FLRHX (Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund) and EMO (ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund) are both mutual funds - FLRHX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while EMO is a MLPs fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, FLRHX returned 9.52%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for EMO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLRHX charges 0.24%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for EMO.

Performance

FLRHX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRHX achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 16.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FLRHX has outperformed EMO with an annualized return of 9.52%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.68% annualized return.

FLRHX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 9.55%
• 1Y: 21.74%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 8.06%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

EMO

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 16.66%
• 6M: 14.22%
• 1Y: 21.96%
• 3Y*: 32.30%
• 5Y*: 26.31%
• 10Y*: 6.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRHX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLRHX Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund	8.84%	17.87%	12.52%	16.53%	-16.51%	14.44%	13.73%	20.72%	-6.67%	18.24%
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund	16.66%	7.38%	44.45%	31.76%	40.13%	74.70%	-64.47%	19.60%	-25.73%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRHX and EMO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2015	0.44

The correlation between FLRHX and EMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLRHX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRHX

FLRHX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FLRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FLRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FLRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FLRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FLRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

EMO

EMO Risk / Return Rank: 24
EMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
EMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
EMO Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EMO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRHX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLRHX	EMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.33	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	1.94	+1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.25	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	2.03	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.64	4.46	+8.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLRHX vs. EMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the EMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRHX and EMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLRHX	EMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	1.33	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.99	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.16	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.11	+0.51

Drawdowns

FLRHX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRHX drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRHX and EMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRHX	EMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.23%	-95.06%	+61.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.64%	-10.87%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.86%	-18.81%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.23%	-28.59%	-4.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.23%	-93.02%	+59.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-5.94%	+5.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-31.95%	+24.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	4.93%	-3.22%

Volatility

FLRHX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) is 2.83%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that FLRHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRHX	EMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	5.27%	-2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.59%	12.22%	-4.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.33%	16.59%	-7.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.11%	26.71%	-11.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	41.24%	-27.34%

FLRHX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRHX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLRHX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison

FLRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, less than EMO's 8.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund	8.55%	9.41%	7.16%	6.79%	6.71%	6.71%	15.82%	10.94%	16.39%	10.85%	9.76%	11.88%
FLRHX Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund	6.85%	7.46%	3.01%	2.83%	4.09%	18.13%	3.89%	3.94%	6.43%	2.24%	2.54%	5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRHX and EMO in my portfolio?

FLRHX and EMO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLRHX or EMO?

EMO has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to FLRHX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRHX dropped -33.23% vs EMO's -95.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.