PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRG vs. FLBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRG vs. FLBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than FLBL's 0.47% return.


FLRG

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
7.49%
6M
6.89%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*

FLBL

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.11%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRG vs. FLBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
7.49%13.92%23.36%18.31%-10.98%29.36%9.90%
FLBL
Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF
0.47%3.59%8.26%14.83%-2.69%4.35%2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG and FLBL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.43

The correlation between FLRG and FLBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRG vs. FLBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRG
FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FLBL
FLBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FLBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRG vs. FLBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLRGFLBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.15

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

0.63

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

2.11

+6.82

FLRG vs. FLBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the FLBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG and FLBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLRG vs. FLBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FLBL drawdown of -19.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and FLBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRGFLBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-19.52%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-3.18%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-3.91%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.64%

-6.80%

-12.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-0.53%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-1.00%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

0.94%

+0.92%

Volatility

FLRG vs. FLBL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) at 0.67%. This indicates that FLRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRGFLBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

0.67%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

2.25%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

2.62%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

3.86%

+11.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

5.71%

+9.32%

FLRG vs. FLBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FLBL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRG vs. FLBL - Dividend Comparison

FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than FLBL's 7.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLBL
Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF
7.61%7.24%8.05%8.37%5.53%3.57%3.22%3.97%2.21%
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.36%1.42%1.42%1.39%1.62%1.36%1.47%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRG and FLBL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLRG has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to FLBL (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRG dropped -19.64% vs FLBL's -19.52%.

On 5-year performance, FLRG leads with 12.45% vs 5.11% for FLBL. On fees, FLRG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLBL has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLRG has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLRG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FLBL.

FLBL has the higher dividend yield at 7.61%, compared with 1.36% for FLRG.

FLRG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FLBL is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLRG and 0.45% for FLBL.

FLRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRG and FLBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer