FLRG vs. EQL

Last updated Aug 3, 2026

FLRG (Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FLRG tracks the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index while EQL tracks the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLRG returned 11.92%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for EQL. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FLRG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.

Performance

FLRG vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLRG having a 10.29% return and EQL slightly higher at 10.71%.

FLRG

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 8.30%
• YTD: 10.29%
• 1Y: 17.72%
• 3Y*: 17.69%
• 5Y*: 11.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.43%

EQL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 12.39%
• ALL TIME*: 13.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	$3.33M	$2.84M	$2.70M
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	$441.29K	$669.16K	$816.00K

FLRG vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	10.29%	13.92%	23.36%	18.31%	-10.98%	29.36%	9.90%
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	10.71%	13.09%	16.44%	16.87%	-10.72%	29.32%	10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG and EQL is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020	0.90

The correlation between FLRG and EQL shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLRG vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLRG	EQL
Technology	37.5%	10.2%
Financial Services	12.1%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	9.6%
Healthcare	9.7%	9.4%
Communication Services	9.2%	8.9%
Industrials	7.7%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	8.8%
Energy	4.2%	8.7%
Basic Materials	2.1%	8.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	8.7%
Utilities	1.1%	9.4%

Return for Risk

FLRG vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLRG

FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 68
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

EQL

EQL Risk / Return Rank: 79
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLRG vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLRG	EQL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.82	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.54	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	2.78	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	10.89	-2.22

FLRG vs. EQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the EQL Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG and EQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLRG vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and EQL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRG	EQL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-35.65%	+16.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-6.19%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-15.07%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.64%	-19.24%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.27%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.67%	-3.23%	-0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.58%	+0.31%

Volatility

FLRG vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.23%. This indicates that FLRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRG	EQL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	2.23%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.18%	7.03%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	9.50%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	14.51%	+0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	16.49%	-1.56%

FLRG vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLRG vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than EQL's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	1.35%	1.73%	1.78%	1.96%	2.14%	1.69%	2.29%	1.95%	2.39%	1.97%	2.89%	2.07%
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	1.37%	1.42%	1.42%	1.39%	1.62%	1.36%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRG and EQL in my portfolio?

FLRG and EQL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLRG or EQL?

FLRG has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to EQL (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRG dropped -19.64% vs EQL's -35.65%.

Which ETF is better, FLRG or EQL?

On 5-year performance, FLRG leads with 11.92% vs 10.63% for EQL. On fees, FLRG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLRG or EQL?

Over the 5-year period, FLRG has performed better with a 11.92% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLRG or EQL?

FLRG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLRG or EQL?

FLRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.35% for EQL.

What is the main difference between FLRG and EQL?

FLRG tracks Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLRG and 0.27% for EQL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.