FLRA.DE vs. CAUT.DE
FLRA.DE (Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation) and CAUT.DE (Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - FLRA.DE tracks the Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation while CAUT.DE tracks the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLRA.DE returned 26.58%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for CAUT.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLRA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CAUT.DE.
Performance
FLRA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRA.DE achieves a 19.68% return, which is significantly higher than CAUT.DE's 0.51% return.
FLRA.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 19.68%
- 6M
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 38.01%
- 3Y*
- 26.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAUT.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLRA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRA.DE Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation | 19.68% | 5.59% | 27.26% | 71.63% | -21.53% |
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.51% | 27.42% | 9.31% | -35.25% | -19.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRA.DE and CAUT.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLRA.DE vs. CAUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLRA.DE
CAUT.DE
FLRA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLRA.DE) and Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLRA.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.08 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.01 | 4.42 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLRA.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.18 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | -0.27 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
FLRA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, smaller than the maximum CAUT.DE drawdown of -69.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRA.DE and CAUT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRA.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.22% | -69.24% | +35.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.17% | -15.89% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -42.32% | +8.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -43.96% | +41.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -45.53% | +35.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.91% | 7.51% | +5.40% |
Volatility
FLRA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLRA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) at 6.05%. This indicates that FLRA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLRA.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.80% | 6.05% | +2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.60% | 18.36% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.70% | 28.22% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 33.13% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 33.13% | -5.40% |
FLRA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CAUT.DE's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLRA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLRA.DE nor CAUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLRA.DE and CAUT.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLRA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLRA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
FLRA.DE tracks Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation, while CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLRA.DE and 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLRA.DE and CAUT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer