FLR vs. GD
FLR (Fluor Corporation) and GD (General Dynamics Corporation) are both stocks. Over the past 10 years, FLR returned 0.89%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for GD. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLR vs. GD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLR achieves a 28.08% return, which is significantly higher than GD's 7.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FLR has underperformed GD with an annualized return of 0.89%, while GD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.
FLR
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 28.08%
- 6M
- 16.42%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.32%
- 10Y*
- 0.89%
GD
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 29.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
FLR vs. GD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLR Fluor Corporation | 28.08% | -19.65% | 25.91% | 13.01% | 39.93% | 55.10% | -14.55% | -39.54% | -36.61% | 0.15% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 7.93% | 30.39% | 3.52% | 7.13% | 21.69% | 43.77% | -13.14% | 14.80% | -21.34% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLR and GD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2000 | 0.40 |
The correlation between FLR and GD shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLR:
$2.65
GD:
$15.92
FLR:
19.14
GD:
22.63
FLR:
0.04
GD:
2.86
FLR:
0.44
GD:
1.83
FLR:
$15.19B
GD:
$53.81B
FLR:
-$247.00M
GD:
$7.48B
FLR:
-$276.00M
GD:
$6.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLR vs. GD — Risk / Return Rank
FLR
GD
FLR vs. GD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluor Corporation (FLR) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLR | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.27 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 2.15 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 7.36 | -7.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLR vs. GD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLR drawdown since its inception was -95.89%, which is greater than GD's maximum drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLR and GD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLR | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.89% | -75.67% | -20.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.19% | -14.53% | -15.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.63% | -22.55% | -25.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.63% | -22.55% | -25.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.16% | -51.63% | -42.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.58% | -1.49% | -37.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.62% | -15.60% | -26.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.52% | 4.23% | +15.29% |
Volatility
FLR vs. GD - Volatility Comparison
Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to General Dynamics Corporation (GD) at 7.70%. This indicates that FLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLR | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.37% | 7.70% | +7.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.04% | 17.78% | +17.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.73% | 21.67% | +30.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.30% | 20.54% | +24.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.71% | 22.76% | +34.95% |
Dividends
FLR vs. GD - Dividend Comparison
FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLR Fluor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.78% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 1.69% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.24% | 2.90% | 2.26% | 2.31% | 1.61% | 1.72% | 1.96% |
Financials
FLR vs. GD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fluor Corporation and General Dynamics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLR vs. GD - Profitability Comparison
FLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.00M and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.4%.
GD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.
FLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 92.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
GD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
FLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
GD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLR and GD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLR has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to GD (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLR dropped -95.89% vs GD's -75.67%.
GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLR and GD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer