PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQS vs. QSML
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLQS vs. QSML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLQS vs. QSML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
0.17%5.04%10.84%
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
-2.60%5.49%10.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than QSML's -2.60% return.


FLQS

1D
0.88%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
0.17%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*

QSML

1D
0.50%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
-2.60%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLQS vs. QSML - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QSML's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLQS vs. QSML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

QSML
QSML Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
QSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSML Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSML Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQS vs. QSML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQSQSMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

0.66

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

1.12

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.14

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.10

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.01

4.04

-1.02

FLQS vs. QSML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the QSML Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQS and QSML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQSQSMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.66

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.28

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between FLQS and QSML is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLQS vs. QSML - Dividend Comparison

FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than QSML's 0.64% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.44%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
0.64%0.62%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLQS vs. QSML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, which is greater than QSML's maximum drawdown of -28.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and QSML.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQSQSMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-28.54%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-14.44%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.73%

-7.80%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-6.31%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.92%

-0.31%

Volatility

FLQS vs. QSML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) is 5.34%, while Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that FLQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLQSQSMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

6.20%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

12.95%

-2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.34%

22.86%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

21.25%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

21.25%

+0.55%