QSML vs. XSMO
QSML (Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund) and XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSML is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QSML returned 31.80% vs 32.48% for XSMO. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QSML charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for XSMO.
Performance
QSML vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSML achieves a 19.46% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 23.06% return.
QSML
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- YTD
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.80%
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- YTD
- 23.06%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.22K | $17.81K | $19.02K | |
| $21.74M | $21.64M | $21.28M |
QSML vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | 19.46% | 5.49% | 9.93% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 23.06% | 9.80% | 19.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSML and XSMO is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.86 |
The correlation between QSML and XSMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QSML vs. XSMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QSML
XSMO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
QSML
XSMO
Consumer Cyclical
QSML
XSMO
Financial Services
QSML
XSMO
Industrials
QSML
XSMO
Healthcare
QSML
XSMO
Consumer Defensive
QSML
XSMO
Energy
QSML
XSMO
Communication Services
QSML
XSMO
Basic Materials
QSML
XSMO
Real Estate
QSML
XSMO
Utilities
QSML
XSMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSML vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank
QSML
XSMO
QSML vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSML | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.46 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 10.41 | -0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSML vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSML drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, smaller than the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSML and XSMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSML | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.54% | -58.06% | +29.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.72% | -9.44% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.64% | +5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -11.07% | +5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.13% | +0.04% |
Volatility
QSML vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) is 4.71%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that QSML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSML | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 5.83% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 15.67% | -3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.49% | 19.96% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 22.60% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 24.15% | -3.56% |
QSML vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSML has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSML vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
QSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than XSMO's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | 0.52% | 0.62% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.54% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSML and XSMO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSMO has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to QSML (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSML dropped -28.54% vs XSMO's -58.06%.
On 1-year performance, XSMO leads with 32.48% vs 31.80% for QSML. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, QSML has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 32.48% return vs 31.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QSML.
XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.52% for QSML.
QSML is categorized as Quality Factor, while XSMO is Momentum. QSML tracks WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QSML and 0.36% for XSMO.
QSML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSML and XSMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer