FLQS vs. BBMC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC).

FLQS and BBMC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLQS is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2017. BBMC is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. It was launched on Apr 14, 2020. Both FLQS and BBMC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FLQS vs. BBMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLQS vs. BBMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	0.17%	5.04%	8.34%	21.28%	-16.88%	26.58%	53.42%
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	2.89%	12.24%	15.15%	18.37%	-19.77%	17.64%	61.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than BBMC's 2.89% return.

FLQS

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: -0.73%
• 1Y: 10.34%
• 3Y*: 9.75%
• 5Y*: 4.58%
• 10Y*: —

BBMC

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 22.25%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: 6.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQS vs. BBMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMC's 0.07% expense ratio.

FLQS

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF

BBMC

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

Return for Risk

FLQS vs. BBMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQS

FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 29
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

BBMC

BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 59
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQS vs. BBMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLQS	BBMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	1.04	-0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	1.56	-0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.22	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	1.62	-0.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	6.94	-3.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLQS vs. BBMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the BBMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQS and BBMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLQS	BBMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	1.04	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.30	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.75	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between FLQS and BBMC is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FLQS vs. BBMC - Dividend Comparison

FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than BBMC's 1.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	1.44%	1.16%	1.29%	1.75%	1.40%	0.95%	1.20%	1.41%	1.27%	1.02%
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.24%	1.25%	1.31%	1.36%	1.48%	0.87%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FLQS vs. BBMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, which is greater than BBMC's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and BBMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLQS	BBMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.16%	-30.11%	-12.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-14.24%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.05%	-30.11%	+2.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.73%	-5.90%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-9.14%	+1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	3.32%	+0.29%

Volatility

FLQS vs. BBMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) is 5.34%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that FLQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLQS	BBMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	6.78%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.93%	12.75%	-1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.34%	21.57%	-2.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.35%	20.55%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	21.20%	+0.60%