PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQM vs. USMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQM vs. USMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQM achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than USMF's 4.94% return.


FLQM

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.68%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

USMF

1D
0.36%
1M
4.05%
YTD
4.94%
6M
5.66%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQM vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.19%5.16%14.32%17.47%-12.95%28.76%15.50%28.56%-4.24%12.38%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
4.94%4.60%19.65%13.47%-8.82%21.26%12.01%24.06%-4.72%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQM and USMF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.85

The correlation between FLQM and USMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQM vs. USMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQM
USMF

Consumer Cyclical

18.7%
11.1%

Industrials

18.4%
7.8%

Financial Services

15.4%
11.8%

Technology

12.4%
35.6%

Healthcare

12.2%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
5.2%

Energy

5.4%
4.1%

Real Estate

4.4%
2.0%

Communication Services

3.3%
10.3%

Utilities

1.6%
2.0%

Basic Materials

0.2%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQM
18.7%
USMF
11.1%

Industrials

FLQM
18.4%
USMF
7.8%

Financial Services

FLQM
15.4%
USMF
11.8%

Technology

FLQM
12.4%
USMF
35.6%

Healthcare

FLQM
12.2%
USMF
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

FLQM
7.7%
USMF
5.2%

Energy

FLQM
5.4%
USMF
4.1%

Real Estate

FLQM
4.4%
USMF
2.0%

Communication Services

FLQM
3.3%
USMF
10.3%

Utilities

FLQM
1.6%
USMF
2.0%

Basic Materials

FLQM
0.2%
USMF
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQM vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQM
FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

USMF
USMF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQM vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQMUSMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.02

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.12

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.11

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.97

3.35

-0.38

FLQM vs. USMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the USMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQM and USMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQMUSMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.56

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Drawdowns

FLQM vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQM drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, roughly equal to the maximum USMF drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQM and USMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQMUSMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-36.24%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

-6.47%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-15.39%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

-18.10%

-4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

0.00%

-2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-4.16%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.15%

+0.55%

Volatility

FLQM vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) at 2.22%. This indicates that FLQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQMUSMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.22%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

7.46%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

10.78%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

14.26%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

16.97%

+1.51%

FLQM vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLQM vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison

FLQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than USMF's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.51%1.49%1.28%1.27%1.33%1.05%1.10%1.37%1.42%1.15%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
1.31%1.37%1.22%1.33%1.74%1.42%1.34%1.38%1.45%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQM and USMF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLQM has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to USMF (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQM dropped -37.26% vs USMF's -36.24%.

On 5-year performance, USMF leads with 7.97% vs 6.90% for FLQM. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USMF has performed better with a 7.97% return vs 6.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FLQM.

FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.31% for USMF.

FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index, while USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLQM and 0.28% for USMF.

USMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQM and USMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer