PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQM vs. PEXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQM vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQM achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 23.12% return.


FLQM

1D
0.02%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.13%
1Y
6.77%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*

PEXL

1D
0.57%
1M
12.19%
YTD
23.12%
6M
24.66%
1Y
53.95%
3Y*
22.51%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQM vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.21%5.16%14.32%17.47%-12.95%28.76%15.50%28.56%-9.25%
PEXL
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
23.12%27.33%5.79%24.40%-20.41%30.12%25.02%39.86%-17.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQM and PEXL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018

0.83

The correlation between FLQM and PEXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLQM vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQM
PEXL

Consumer Cyclical

18.7%
4.3%

Industrials

18.4%
6.4%

Financial Services

15.4%

-

Technology

12.4%
55.1%

Healthcare

12.2%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.3%

Energy

5.4%
1.1%

Real Estate

4.4%

-

Communication Services

3.3%
15.1%

Utilities

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQM
18.7%
PEXL
4.3%

Industrials

FLQM
18.4%
PEXL
6.4%

Financial Services

FLQM
15.4%
PEXL

-

Technology

FLQM
12.4%
PEXL
55.1%

Healthcare

FLQM
12.2%
PEXL
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLQM
7.7%
PEXL
6.3%

Energy

FLQM
5.4%
PEXL
1.1%

Real Estate

FLQM
4.4%
PEXL

-

Communication Services

FLQM
3.3%
PEXL
15.1%

Utilities

FLQM
1.6%
PEXL

-

Basic Materials

FLQM
0.2%
PEXL
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQM vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQM
FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PEXL
PEXL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PEXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEXL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PEXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEXL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQM vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQMPEXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.51

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

4.74

-3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

20.42

-17.91

FLQM vs. PEXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the PEXL Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQM and PEXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQMPEXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

3.05

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.61

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.65

-0.08

Drawdowns

FLQM vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQM drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, roughly equal to the maximum PEXL drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQM and PEXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQMPEXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-36.76%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

-11.43%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-24.72%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

-30.44%

+7.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

0.00%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-6.72%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.65%

+0.06%

Volatility

FLQM vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) is 2.75%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that FLQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQMPEXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

5.25%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

13.10%

-4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

17.80%

-5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

21.86%

-5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

24.04%

-5.56%

FLQM vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLQM vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison

FLQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than PEXL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.51%1.49%1.28%1.27%1.33%1.05%1.10%1.37%1.42%1.15%
PEXL
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
0.34%0.44%0.48%0.48%0.60%0.22%0.48%0.49%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQM and PEXL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEXL has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to FLQM (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQM dropped -37.26% vs PEXL's -36.76%.

On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 13.25% vs 6.76% for FLQM. On fees, FLQM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLQM has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 6.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLQM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEXL.

FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.34% for PEXL.

FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLQM and 0.60% for PEXL.

PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQM and PEXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer