PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOT vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLOT vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than TFLO's 2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FLOT has outperformed TFLO with an annualized return of 3.07%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.41% annualized return.


FLOT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.29%
6M
2.11%
YTD
2.47%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
3.07%
ALL TIME*
2.31%

TFLO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
6M
1.88%
YTD
2.22%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
2.41%
ALL TIME*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$94.03M$97.06M$92.58M
$79.31M$72.74M$75.47M

FLOT vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.47%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%1.65%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.22%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%0.43%2.04%1.76%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOT and TFLO is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOT vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLOT vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLOTTFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-36.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.02

12.34

-9.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.73

199.41

-188.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

98.80

766.49

-667.68

FLOT vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOT Sharpe Ratio is 6.11, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 13.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOT and TFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLOT vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and TFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOTTFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.54%

-5.01%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-0.02%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

-0.04%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.36%

-0.13%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

-0.16%

-13.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.10%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.01%

+0.04%

Volatility

FLOT vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a higher volatility of 0.19% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.08%. This indicates that FLOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOTTFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

0.08%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.65%

0.19%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76%

0.29%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.78%

0.35%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

0.45%

+3.70%

FLOT vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLOT and TFLO have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLOT vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than TFLO's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.46%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.83%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOT and TFLO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLOT has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to TFLO (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOT dropped -13.54% vs TFLO's -5.01%.

On 10-year performance, FLOT leads with 3.07% vs 2.41% for TFLO. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 3.07% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLOT and TFLO have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 3.83% for TFLO.

FLOT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TFLO is Government Bonds. FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, while TFLO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.73 vs 6.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOT and TFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer