FLOT vs. SMST

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLOT is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. FLOT is passively managed, while SMST is actively managed. Over the past year, FLOT returned 4.64% vs 223.04% for SMST. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. FLOT charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.

Performance

FLOT vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -31.56% return.

FLOT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 2.19%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 1Y: 4.64%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 4.28%
• 10Y*: 3.06%

SMST

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: 37.17%
• 6M: -24.18%
• YTD: -31.56%
• 1Y: 223.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOT vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF	2.31%	4.91%	2.21%
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	-31.56%	-44.36%	-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOT and SMST is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.22

Return for Risk

FLOT vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOT

FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

SMST

SMST Risk / Return Rank: 53
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOT vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLOT	SMST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.28	1.37	+4.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.31	2.22	+9.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.08	1.29	+1.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.88	2.39	+8.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	100.63	4.64	+95.99

FLOT vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOT Sharpe Ratio is 6.28, which is higher than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOT and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLOT vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and SMST.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLOT	SMST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.54%	-99.25%	+85.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.43%	-85.39%	+84.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-97.31%	+97.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-90.88%	+90.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	43.98%	-43.93%

Volatility

FLOT vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) is 0.16%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.47%. This indicates that FLOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLOT	SMST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.16%	56.47%	-56.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.63%	135.94%	-135.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75%	149.09%	-148.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.77%	167.87%	-166.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.15%	167.87%	-163.72%

FLOT vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLOT vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF	4.47%	4.84%	5.82%	5.66%	2.06%	0.43%	1.25%	2.78%	2.41%	1.46%	0.97%	0.53%
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLOT and SMST in my portfolio?

FLOT and SMST have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLOT or SMST?

SMST has higher volatility (56.47%) compared to FLOT (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOT dropped -13.54% vs SMST's -99.25%.

Which ETF is better, FLOT or SMST?

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 223.04% vs 4.64% for FLOT. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLOT or SMST?

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 223.04% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLOT or SMST?

FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLOT or SMST?

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

What is the main difference between FLOT and SMST?

FLOT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLOT and 1.29% for SMST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.28 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.