FLN vs. FLMX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FLN (First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund) and FLMX (Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - FLN tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index while FLMX tracks the FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLN returned 10.23%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for FLMX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLMX.

Performance

FLN vs. FLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLN achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than FLMX's 8.80% return.

FLN

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: 8.80%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 1Y: 36.58%
• 3Y*: 13.82%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: 8.41%

FLMX

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -4.34%
• 6M: 4.69%
• YTD: 8.80%
• 1Y: 27.96%
• 3Y*: 8.67%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLN vs. FLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund	14.24%	55.05%	-23.10%	29.68%	2.73%	-6.94%	-12.27%	27.22%	-8.31%	4.10%
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF	8.80%	53.62%	-28.45%	39.35%	2.40%	19.58%	-3.50%	12.13%	-13.32%	-0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FLN and FLMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.61

The correlation between FLN and FLMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLN vs. FLMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLN	FLMX
Financial Services	23.6%	18.6%
Utilities	16.2%	-
Basic Materials	12.9%	24.4%
Industrials	12.5%	11.6%
Energy	9.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.8%	28.2%
Communication Services	6.6%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	1.3%
Real Estate	5.1%	6.6%
Technology	2.1%	-
Healthcare	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

FLN vs. FLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLN

FLN Risk / Return Rank: 64
FLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FLN Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FLN Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FLMX

FLMX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLN vs. FLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLN	FLMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.29	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.89	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.23	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	1.98	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	6.59	+0.92

FLN vs. FLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FLMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLN and FLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLN vs. FLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLN drawdown since its inception was -57.95%, which is greater than FLMX's maximum drawdown of -50.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLN and FLMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLN	FLMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.95%	-50.05%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.10%	-14.18%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.23%	-31.72%	+6.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.95%	-31.72%	+5.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.92%	-7.52%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.84%	-11.97%	-6.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.89%	4.26%	+0.63%

Volatility

FLN vs. FLMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) is 5.29%, while Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that FLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLN	FLMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.29%	6.61%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.59%	18.23%	-0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.21%	21.78%	-0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.55%	22.09%	+0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.49%	24.64%	+2.85%

FLN vs. FLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLN vs. FLMX - Dividend Comparison

FLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than FLMX's 3.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF	3.93%	3.99%	3.31%	2.90%	4.22%	3.15%	1.48%	2.95%	2.51%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund	3.47%	3.40%	6.26%	4.17%	5.57%	4.70%	1.64%	1.91%	3.08%	10.28%	1.06%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLN and FLMX in my portfolio?

FLN and FLMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLN or FLMX?

FLMX has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to FLN (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLN dropped -57.95% vs FLMX's -50.05%.

Which ETF is better, FLN or FLMX?

On 5-year performance, FLMX leads with 12.77% vs 10.23% for FLN. On fees, FLMX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLN has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLN or FLMX?

Over the 5-year period, FLMX has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLN or FLMX?

FLMX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLN or FLMX?

FLMX has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 3.47% for FLN.

What is the main difference between FLN and FLMX?

FLN tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index, while FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FLN and 0.19% for FLMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.