FLN vs. COLO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLN (First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund) and COLO (Global X MSCI Colombia ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - FLN tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index while COLO tracks the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FLN returned 9.85%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for COLO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for COLO.

Performance

FLN vs. COLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLN achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly lower than COLO's 14.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FLN has outperformed COLO with an annualized return of 9.85%, while COLO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.37% annualized return.

FLN

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -5.45%
• YTD: 11.67%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 36.27%
• 3Y*: 16.20%
• 5Y*: 8.98%
• 10Y*: 9.85%

COLO

• 1D: -2.42%
• 1M: 8.62%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 6M: 13.91%
• 1Y: 48.73%
• 3Y*: 34.47%
• 5Y*: 14.34%
• 10Y*: 6.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLN vs. COLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund	11.67%	55.05%	-23.10%	29.68%	2.73%	-6.94%	-12.27%	27.22%	-8.31%	21.54%
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	14.14%	68.88%	4.68%	24.92%	-21.32%	-11.50%	-14.60%	30.42%	-19.88%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FLN and COLO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011	0.51

The correlation between FLN and COLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLN vs. COLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLN	COLO
Financial Services	23.4%	39.3%
Utilities	16.9%	17.7%
Industrials	12.4%	2.4%
Basic Materials	12.0%	18.4%
Energy	10.2%	17.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	-
Communication Services	7.1%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	1.5%
Real Estate	4.7%	-
Technology	2.1%	-
Healthcare	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

FLN vs. COLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLN

FLN Risk / Return Rank: 52
FLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FLN Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FLN Martin Ratio Rank: 53

COLO

COLO Risk / Return Rank: 60
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLN vs. COLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLN	COLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	2.21	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	3.02	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	2.75	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.06	7.53	+1.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLN vs. COLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the COLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLN and COLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLN	COLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	2.21	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.62	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.25	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.22	-0.14

Drawdowns

FLN vs. COLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLN drawdown since its inception was -57.95%, smaller than the maximum COLO drawdown of -78.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLN and COLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLN	COLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.95%	-78.91%	+20.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.42%	-17.79%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.23%	-18.35%	-6.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.95%	-43.86%	+17.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.75%	-62.75%	+5.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.99%	-22.51%	+12.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-40.32%	+21.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.01%	6.49%	-2.48%

Volatility

FLN vs. COLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) is 6.41%, while Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that FLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLN	COLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	10.70%	-4.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.20%	19.42%	-1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.96%	22.28%	-1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.59%	23.21%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.64%	25.44%	+2.20%

FLN vs. COLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than COLO's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLN vs. COLO - Dividend Comparison

FLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than COLO's 6.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	6.58%	7.51%	6.08%	6.99%	12.55%	2.32%	3.23%	3.04%	3.03%	1.83%	1.48%	1.58%
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund	3.59%	3.40%	6.26%	4.17%	5.57%	4.70%	1.64%	1.91%	3.08%	10.28%	1.06%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLN and COLO in my portfolio?

FLN and COLO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLN or COLO?

COLO has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to FLN (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLN dropped -57.95% vs COLO's -78.91%.

Which ETF is better, FLN or COLO?

On 10-year performance, FLN leads with 9.85% vs 6.37% for COLO. On fees, COLO is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, FLN has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLN or COLO?

Over the 10-year period, FLN has performed better with a 9.85% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLN or COLO?

COLO is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLN or COLO?

COLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 3.59% for FLN.

What is the main difference between FLN and COLO?

FLN tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index, while COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FLN and 0.62% for COLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.