PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLMX vs. FLJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLMX vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLMX vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMX
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
10.13%53.62%-28.45%39.35%2.40%19.58%-3.50%12.13%-13.32%-0.92%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
9.29%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than FLJH's 9.29% return.


FLMX

1D
1.53%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
10.13%
6M
16.88%
1Y
52.18%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*

FLJH

1D
2.72%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
17.51%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLMX vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLMX vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLMX
FLMX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLMX vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLMXFLJHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

1.77

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

2.43

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.32

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.93

12.34

+2.59

FLMX vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMX and FLJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLMXFLJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.77

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.00

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.69

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between FLMX and FLJH is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLMX vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

FLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than FLJH's 3.57% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMX
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
3.62%3.99%3.31%2.90%4.22%3.15%1.48%2.95%2.51%0.31%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.57%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%

Drawdowns

FLMX vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMX and FLJH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMXFLJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.05%

-31.51%

-18.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.18%

-11.83%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.72%

-20.39%

-11.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

-5.01%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.21%

-5.39%

-6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

3.19%

+0.52%

Volatility

FLMX vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 7.76%. This indicates that FLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLMXFLJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

7.76%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

14.50%

+2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.36%

23.00%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.90%

18.50%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.76%

19.90%

+4.86%