FLMVX vs. RSVAX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FLMVX (JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund) and RSVAX (Victory RS Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FLMVX returned 10.66%/yr vs 9.50%/yr for RSVAX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLMVX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RSVAX.

Performance

FLMVX vs. RSVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMVX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than RSVAX's 6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FLMVX has outperformed RSVAX with an annualized return of 10.66%, while RSVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.50% annualized return.

FLMVX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 9.09%
• 6M: 7.80%
• 1Y: 14.38%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 10.66%

RSVAX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 5.11%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 10.48%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 9.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLMVX vs. RSVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLMVX JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund	9.09%	5.17%	27.75%	11.38%	-8.11%	29.89%	0.36%	26.67%	-11.66%	13.67%
RSVAX Victory RS Value Fund	6.38%	4.58%	12.58%	7.63%	-2.98%	27.30%	-2.60%	31.36%	-10.84%	17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMVX and RSVAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 1997	0.84

The correlation between FLMVX and RSVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLMVX vs. RSVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLMVX

FLMVX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FLMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FLMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FLMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FLMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FLMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

RSVAX

RSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 19
RSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
RSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
RSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
RSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
RSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLMVX vs. RSVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLMVX	RSVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	0.97	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.47	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.17	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	1.49	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.16	5.02	+2.14

FLMVX vs. RSVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the RSVAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMVX and RSVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLMVX vs. RSVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMVX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum RSVAX drawdown of -59.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMVX and RSVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLMVX	RSVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.72%	-59.23%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.19%	-7.81%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.91%	-17.98%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.59%	-23.58%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.06%	-43.49%	+0.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-1.81%	+0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-13.79%	+7.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	2.31%	-0.18%

Volatility

FLMVX vs. RSVAX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) at 3.17%. This indicates that FLMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLMVX	RSVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	3.17%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	8.53%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	12.02%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	18.05%	+1.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.42%	19.19%	+1.23%

FLMVX vs. RSVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RSVAX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLMVX vs. RSVAX - Dividend Comparison

FLMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.40%, more than RSVAX's 8.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLMVX JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund	19.40%	21.16%	23.25%	6.10%	11.73%	14.98%	7.73%	5.20%	8.30%	2.71%	7.04%	6.69%
RSVAX Victory RS Value Fund	8.30%	8.83%	9.89%	6.48%	6.33%	14.14%	1.93%	7.38%	15.47%	25.04%	12.47%	9.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLMVX and RSVAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FLMVX and RSVAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLMVX or RSVAX?

FLMVX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to RSVAX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMVX dropped -54.72% vs RSVAX's -59.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.