PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLMVX vs. PVMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLMVX vs. PVMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMVX achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly lower than PVMIX's 12.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FLMVX has underperformed PVMIX with an annualized return of 10.20%, while PVMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


FLMVX

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
7.36%
6M
7.67%
1Y
14.50%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
10.20%

PVMIX

1D
0.23%
1M
1.52%
YTD
12.62%
6M
12.05%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLMVX vs. PVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
7.36%5.17%27.75%11.38%-8.11%29.89%0.36%26.67%-11.66%13.67%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
12.62%6.09%33.38%11.04%-5.95%30.97%6.50%26.69%-11.07%14.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMVX and PVMIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2003

0.97

The correlation between FLMVX and PVMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLMVX vs. PVMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLMVX
FLMVX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FLMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

PVMIX
PVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLMVX vs. PVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLMVXPVMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.66

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.62

9.43

-2.80

FLMVX vs. PVMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the PVMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMVX and PVMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLMVXPVMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.67

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.65

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.66

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.54

+0.09

Drawdowns

FLMVX vs. PVMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMVX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, roughly equal to the maximum PVMIX drawdown of -56.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMVX and PVMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMVXPVMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.72%

-56.76%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-7.37%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.91%

-16.78%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.59%

-17.05%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.06%

-41.34%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-6.84%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.07%

+0.06%

Volatility

FLMVX vs. PVMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) is 2.64%, while Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that FLMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMVXPVMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.07%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

8.47%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

11.74%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.36%

18.25%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.43%

19.21%

+1.22%

FLMVX vs. PVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PVMIX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLMVX vs. PVMIX - Dividend Comparison

FLMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.71%, more than PVMIX's 6.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
19.71%21.16%23.25%6.10%11.73%14.98%7.73%5.20%8.30%2.71%7.04%6.69%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
6.41%7.22%33.98%4.63%7.12%11.44%1.38%5.11%13.23%6.92%1.58%11.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLMVX and PVMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PVMIX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to FLMVX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMVX dropped -54.72% vs PVMIX's -56.76%.

PVMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLMVX and PVMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer