FLMVX vs. GTTMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLMVX (JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund) and GTTMX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FLMVX returned 10.20%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for GTTMX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLMVX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for GTTMX.

Performance

FLMVX vs. GTTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMVX achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly lower than GTTMX's 13.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FLMVX has underperformed GTTMX with an annualized return of 10.20%, while GTTMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.

FLMVX

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 14.50%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: 8.99%
• 10Y*: 10.20%

GTTMX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 13.18%
• 6M: 14.70%
• 1Y: 29.25%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 12.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLMVX vs. GTTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLMVX JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund	7.36%	5.17%	27.75%	11.38%	-8.11%	29.89%	0.36%	26.67%	-11.66%	13.67%
GTTMX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio	13.18%	18.40%	14.84%	9.39%	-13.90%	41.28%	5.12%	24.18%	-11.99%	22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMVX and GTTMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007	0.91

The correlation between FLMVX and GTTMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLMVX vs. GTTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLMVX

FLMVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
FLMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FLMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FLMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FLMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FLMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GTTMX

GTTMX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GTTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GTTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GTTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
GTTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GTTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLMVX vs. GTTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLMVX	GTTMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.98	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	2.74	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.33	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	4.51	-2.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.62	15.20	-8.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLMVX vs. GTTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the GTTMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMVX and GTTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLMVX	GTTMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.98	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.55	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.60	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.42	+0.20

Drawdowns

FLMVX vs. GTTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMVX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, roughly equal to the maximum GTTMX drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMVX and GTTMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLMVX	GTTMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.72%	-56.24%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.19%	-6.51%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.91%	-20.62%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.59%	-24.12%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.06%	-44.59%	+1.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.10%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.45%	-10.25%	+3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	1.92%	+0.21%

Volatility

FLMVX vs. GTTMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) is 2.64%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that FLMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLMVX	GTTMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	3.96%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.46%	10.84%	-2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.99%	14.84%	-2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.36%	18.32%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.43%	20.50%	-0.07%

FLMVX vs. GTTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTMX's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLMVX vs. GTTMX - Dividend Comparison

FLMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.71%, more than GTTMX's 16.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLMVX JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund	19.71%	21.16%	23.25%	6.10%	11.73%	14.98%	7.73%	5.20%	8.30%	2.71%	7.04%	6.69%
GTTMX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio	16.65%	18.85%	14.45%	5.83%	0.40%	17.50%	11.58%	5.95%	9.88%	3.00%	0.55%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLMVX and GTTMX in my portfolio?

FLMVX and GTTMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLMVX or GTTMX?

GTTMX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to FLMVX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMVX dropped -54.72% vs GTTMX's -56.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.