FLMI vs. AUSM
FLMI (Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF) and AUSM (Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLMI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AUSM.
Performance
FLMI vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLMI achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than AUSM's 0.98% return.
FLMI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
AUSM
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLMI vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF | 2.31% | 5.01% |
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 0.98% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLMI and AUSM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLMI vs. AUSM — Risk / Return Rank
FLMI
AUSM
FLMI vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLMI | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLMI | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 3.98 | -3.33 |
Drawdowns
FLMI vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLMI drawdown since its inception was -14.66%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMI and AUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLMI | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.66% | -0.42% | -14.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.02% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -0.09% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | — | — |
Volatility
FLMI vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLMI | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.09% | 0.73% | +2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 0.73% | +3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 0.73% | +3.99% |
FLMI vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLMI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLMI vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison
FLMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than AUSM's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 2.39% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF | 3.87% | 3.89% | 4.08% | 3.71% | 3.08% | 2.22% | 2.09% | 2.71% | 2.41% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLMI and AUSM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FLMI.
FLMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 2.39% for AUSM.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLMI and 0.18% for AUSM.
Find the right allocation for FLMI and AUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer