PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLMB vs. EZBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLMB vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMB achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -25.36% return.


FLMB

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.27%
1Y
8.74%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*

EZBC

1D
-2.73%
1M
-18.42%
YTD
-25.36%
6M
-29.82%
1Y
-38.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLMB vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLMB
Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF
1.89%3.93%2.39%
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
-25.36%-6.56%100.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMB and EZBC is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLMB vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLMB
FLMB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EZBC
EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLMB vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLMBEZBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.86

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

-0.79

+3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

-1.36

+10.92

FLMB vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMB and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLMBEZBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

-0.89

+3.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.30

+0.12

Drawdowns

FLMB vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMB drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMB and EZBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMBEZBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.90%

-49.37%

+31.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-49.37%

+46.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-48.04%

+47.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-16.01%

+11.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

28.42%

-27.50%

Volatility

FLMB vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) is 1.11%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that FLMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMBEZBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

9.43%

-8.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

34.44%

-31.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

43.67%

-39.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.11%

50.06%

-44.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.58%

50.06%

-44.48%

FLMB vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLMB vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

FLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLMB
Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF
3.75%3.86%3.79%3.49%2.80%1.66%2.07%2.40%2.68%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLMB and EZBC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZBC has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to FLMB (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMB dropped -17.90% vs EZBC's -49.37%.

On 1-year performance, FLMB leads with 8.74% vs -38.68% for EZBC. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLMB has performed better with a 8.74% return vs -38.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FLMB.

FLMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

FLMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while EZBC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLMB and 0.19% for EZBC.

FLMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLMB and EZBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer