PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLLV vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLLV vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLLV achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return.


FLLV

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.09%
6M
10.54%
YTD
13.64%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLLV vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
13.64%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%19.66%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.44%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLLV and UUP is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

-0.18

The correlation between FLLV and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLLV vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLLV
FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLLV vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLLVUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.25

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

2.28

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.57

6.26

+9.31

FLLV vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLLV and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLLV vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLLV drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLV and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLLVUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-22.19%

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.90%

-3.65%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.01%

-10.05%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

-10.37%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-1.26%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-8.88%

+5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.33%

+0.02%

Volatility

FLLV vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that FLLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLLVUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

1.45%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

4.34%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.39%

6.03%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

7.22%

+6.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

6.90%

+8.73%

FLLV vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLLV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLLV vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

FLLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
4.74%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLLV and UUP have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLLV has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLV dropped -33.95% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 5-year performance, FLLV leads with 10.52% vs 5.89% for UUP. On fees, FLLV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLLV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 3.25% for UUP.

FLLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while UUP is Currency. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLLV and 0.75% for UUP.

FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLLV and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer