PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLLV vs. ONEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLLV vs. ONEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLLV achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly higher than ONEV's 6.31% return.


FLLV

1D
0.65%
1M
2.47%
YTD
13.91%
6M
16.10%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*

ONEV

1D
0.20%
1M
2.36%
YTD
6.31%
6M
6.47%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
11.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLLV vs. ONEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
13.91%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%19.66%
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
6.31%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%6.66%30.66%-5.30%18.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FLLV and ONEV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.80

The correlation between FLLV and ONEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLLV vs. ONEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLLV
ONEV

Technology

28.8%
11.0%

Financial Services

13.0%
12.1%

Healthcare

11.6%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
12.7%

Industrials

9.6%
19.5%

Communication Services

7.8%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
8.5%

Energy

4.4%
1.6%

Basic Materials

2.7%
4.0%

Utilities

2.6%
8.9%

Real Estate

2.5%
5.2%

Technology

FLLV
28.8%
ONEV
11.0%

Financial Services

FLLV
13.0%
ONEV
12.1%

Healthcare

FLLV
11.6%
ONEV
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLLV
11.0%
ONEV
12.7%

Industrials

FLLV
9.6%
ONEV
19.5%

Communication Services

FLLV
7.8%
ONEV
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLLV
6.1%
ONEV
8.5%

Energy

FLLV
4.4%
ONEV
1.6%

Basic Materials

FLLV
2.7%
ONEV
4.0%

Utilities

FLLV
2.6%
ONEV
8.9%

Real Estate

FLLV
2.5%
ONEV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLLV vs. ONEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLLV
FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLLV vs. ONEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLLVONEVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.50

1.08

+2.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.08

1.67

+3.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.19

+0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.94

1.57

+4.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.48

5.34

+17.14

FLLV vs. ONEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is higher than the ONEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLLV and ONEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLLVONEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50

1.08

+2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.54

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.67

+0.17

Drawdowns

FLLV vs. ONEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLLV drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum ONEV drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLV and ONEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLLVONEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-39.72%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.90%

-7.75%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.01%

-14.81%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

-18.52%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.99%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-3.90%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

2.27%

-0.98%

Volatility

FLLV vs. ONEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) is 1.97%, while SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that FLLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLLVONEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

2.63%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

7.73%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.28%

11.20%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

14.54%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

17.02%

-1.33%

FLLV vs. ONEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLLV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLLV vs. ONEV - Dividend Comparison

FLLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than ONEV's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
4.70%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%0.00%
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.76%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLLV and ONEV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEV has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to FLLV (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLV dropped -33.95% vs ONEV's -39.72%.

On 5-year performance, FLLV leads with 11.45% vs 7.83% for ONEV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 11.45% return vs 7.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 1.76% for ONEV.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLLV and 0.20% for ONEV.

FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLLV and ONEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer