FLLV vs. EELV
FLLV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF) and EELV (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. FLLV is actively managed, while EELV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLLV returned 11.45%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for EELV. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLLV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EELV.
Performance
FLLV vs. EELV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLLV achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly higher than EELV's 3.97% return.
FLLV
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 16.10%
- 1Y
- 28.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EELV
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 14.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 6.56%
FLLV vs. EELV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 13.91% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.97% | 21.97% | 1.90% | 8.85% | -3.98% | 16.15% | -3.89% | 8.89% | -5.40% | 24.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLLV and EELV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FLLV and EELV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLLV vs. EELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLLV
EELV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FLLV
EELV
Financial Services
FLLV
EELV
Healthcare
FLLV
EELV
Consumer Cyclical
FLLV
EELV
Industrials
FLLV
EELV
Communication Services
FLLV
EELV
Consumer Defensive
FLLV
EELV
Energy
FLLV
EELV
Basic Materials
FLLV
EELV
Utilities
FLLV
EELV
Real Estate
FLLV
EELV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLLV vs. EELV — Risk / Return Rank
FLLV
EELV
FLLV vs. EELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLLV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.50 | 1.34 | +2.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.08 | 1.91 | +3.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.24 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.94 | 1.77 | +4.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.48 | 5.99 | +16.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLLV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50 | 1.34 | +2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.60 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.30 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
FLLV vs. EELV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLLV drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum EELV drawdown of -36.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLV and EELV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLLV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -36.35% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.90% | -8.22% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.01% | -11.79% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -19.04% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.71% | +4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -8.93% | +5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 2.42% | -1.13% |
Volatility
FLLV vs. EELV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) is 1.97%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that FLLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLLV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 3.40% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 9.03% | -3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.28% | 10.87% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 11.36% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 13.64% | +2.05% |
FLLV vs. EELV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLLV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EELV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLLV vs. EELV - Dividend Comparison
FLLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than EELV's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.60% | 3.75% | 4.70% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 4.35% | 2.82% | 3.14% | 5.50% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.53% |
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 4.70% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLLV and EELV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EELV has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to FLLV (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLV dropped -33.95% vs EELV's -36.35%.
On 5-year performance, FLLV leads with 11.45% vs 6.82% for EELV. On fees, FLLV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 11.45% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLLV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.
FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 3.60% for EELV.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLLV and 0.30% for EELV.
FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLLV and EELV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer