PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLLA vs. FTRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLLA vs. FTRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLLA achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than FTRI's 10.97% return.


FLLA

1D
-2.69%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
12.62%
6M
11.76%
1Y
35.32%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*

FTRI

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.13%
YTD
10.97%
6M
14.06%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
10.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLLA vs. FTRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLLA
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
12.62%51.81%-26.89%32.71%7.78%-8.93%-15.08%19.59%-2.78%
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF
10.97%33.62%-3.93%1.53%7.49%25.29%-0.79%21.97%-8.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FLLA and FTRI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2018

0.61

The correlation between FLLA and FTRI shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLLA vs. FTRI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLLA
FTRI

Financial Services

25.9%

-

Basic Materials

19.3%
56.3%

Energy

11.3%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
4.8%

Utilities

9.8%
16.1%

Industrials

9.2%

-

Communication Services

3.9%

-

Real Estate

3.0%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.8%
3.4%

Healthcare

1.6%

-

Technology

0.4%

-

Financial Services

FLLA
25.9%
FTRI

-

Basic Materials

FLLA
19.3%
FTRI
56.3%

Energy

FLLA
11.3%
FTRI
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLLA
11.0%
FTRI
4.8%

Utilities

FLLA
9.8%
FTRI
16.1%

Industrials

FLLA
9.2%
FTRI

-

Communication Services

FLLA
3.9%
FTRI

-

Real Estate

FLLA
3.0%
FTRI
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FLLA
2.8%
FTRI
3.4%

Healthcare

FLLA
1.6%
FTRI

-

Technology

FLLA
0.4%
FTRI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLLA vs. FTRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLLA
FLLA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FLLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FTRI
FTRI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FTRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRI Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLLA vs. FTRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLLAFTRIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.59

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

2.04

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.31

+0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.72

6.63

+2.09

FLLA vs. FTRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLLA Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FTRI Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLLA and FTRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLLAFTRIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.59

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.40

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.48

-0.25

Drawdowns

FLLA vs. FTRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, which is greater than FTRI's maximum drawdown of -43.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and FTRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLLAFTRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.88%

-43.82%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-11.87%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.76%

-15.25%

-12.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-27.51%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.96%

-9.02%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.48%

-8.47%

-5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

4.14%

-0.08%

Volatility

FLLA vs. FTRI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) at 5.54%. This indicates that FLLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLLAFTRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

5.54%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.23%

14.10%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

17.32%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.81%

20.76%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.54%

22.03%

+5.51%

FLLA vs. FTRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FTRI's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLLA vs. FTRI - Dividend Comparison

FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than FTRI's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLLA
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
5.38%6.06%7.04%5.45%9.55%7.60%2.12%3.18%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF
2.33%2.35%4.29%6.56%8.37%6.58%3.64%6.25%4.24%3.60%2.96%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLLA and FTRI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLLA has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to FTRI (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLA dropped -53.88% vs FTRI's -43.82%.

On 5-year performance, FTRI leads with 8.19% vs 7.79% for FLLA. On fees, FLLA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FTRI has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTRI has performed better with a 8.19% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLLA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.

FLLA has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 2.33% for FTRI.

FLLA is categorized as Latin America Equities, while FTRI is Commodity Producers Equities. FLLA tracks FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index, while FTRI tracks Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLLA and 0.70% for FTRI.

FLLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLLA and FTRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer