PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLLA vs. BRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLLA vs. BRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLLA vs. BRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLLA
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
17.39%51.81%-26.89%32.71%7.78%-8.93%-15.08%19.59%-2.78%
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
14.12%54.17%-35.02%37.21%-14.38%-20.40%-21.07%40.66%10.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLLA achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly higher than BRF's 14.12% return.


FLLA

1D
3.89%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
17.39%
6M
25.40%
1Y
54.98%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*

BRF

1D
4.69%
1M
-6.15%
YTD
14.12%
6M
18.82%
1Y
51.65%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLLA vs. BRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BRF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLLA vs. BRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLLA
FLLA Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BRF
BRF Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLLA vs. BRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLLABRFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

1.79

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

2.33

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

3.19

+1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.05

10.54

+4.51

FLLA vs. BRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLLA Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the BRF Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLLA and BRF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLLABRFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.79

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.11

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.07

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between FLLA and BRF is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLLA vs. BRF - Dividend Comparison

FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than BRF's 4.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLLA
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
5.16%6.06%7.04%5.45%9.55%7.60%2.12%3.18%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
4.86%5.54%4.08%5.02%4.13%2.96%1.66%2.54%2.89%4.53%4.25%3.84%

Drawdowns

FLLA vs. BRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, smaller than the maximum BRF drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and BRF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLLABRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.88%

-82.26%

+28.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-16.11%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-50.49%

+22.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.01%

-44.36%

+40.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.69%

-45.76%

+32.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

4.87%

-1.28%

Volatility

FLLA vs. BRF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) is 11.50%, while VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) has a volatility of 14.62%. This indicates that FLLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLLABRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.50%

14.62%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

22.76%

-5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

29.00%

-5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

31.53%

-8.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.66%

34.01%

-6.35%