FLKSX vs. TBCIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FLKSX (Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund) and TBCIX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class) are both mutual funds - FLKSX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TBCIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, FLKSX returned 10.82%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for TBCIX. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FLKSX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for TBCIX.

Performance

FLKSX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKSX achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -3.25% return.

FLKSX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 3.02%
• 6M: 10.87%
• YTD: 15.77%
• 1Y: 25.31%
• 3Y*: 15.93%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.72%

TBCIX

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: -2.44%
• 6M: -1.33%
• YTD: -3.25%
• 1Y: 5.31%
• 3Y*: 22.44%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 16.53%
• ALL TIME*: 15.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLKSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FLKSX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund	15.77%	14.61%	10.81%	14.87%	-5.16%	24.70%	9.32%	25.16%	-10.42%	12.93%
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class	-3.25%	18.94%	48.73%	49.61%	-38.48%	18.30%	34.90%	30.30%	2.13%	15.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKSX and TBCIX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017	0.61

The correlation between FLKSX and TBCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLKSX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLKSX

FLKSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FLKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FLKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FLKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FLKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FLKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

TBCIX

TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLKSX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLKSX	TBCIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	0.22	+1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	0.43	+2.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.05	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	0.23	+2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	0.68	+8.29

FLKSX vs. TBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the TBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKSX and TBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLKSX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKSX drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKSX and TBCIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKSX	TBCIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.70%	-43.26%	+6.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.87%	-16.96%	+8.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-23.06%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.82%	-43.26%	+25.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.96%	+8.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-8.04%	+3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	5.64%	-3.10%

Volatility

FLKSX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) is 2.79%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that FLKSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKSX	TBCIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	5.92%	-3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.98%	14.30%	-5.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	17.67%	-5.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.76%	24.16%	-9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.35%	22.85%	-6.50%

FLKSX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKSX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison

FLKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than TBCIX's 5.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLKSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund	6.36%	7.37%	13.98%	6.70%	3.47%	5.34%	1.47%	2.47%	1.52%	0.63%	0.00%
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class	5.38%	5.20%	18.28%	3.47%	5.84%	10.03%	1.18%	0.59%	2.50%	3.05%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKSX and TBCIX in my portfolio?

FLKSX and TBCIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLKSX or TBCIX?

TBCIX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to FLKSX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKSX dropped -36.70% vs TBCIX's -43.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.