PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKSX vs. FIMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLKSX vs. FIMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKSX achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than FIMVX's 15.21% return.


FLKSX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.13%
YTD
9.94%
6M
10.81%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*

FIMVX

1D
0.95%
1M
3.80%
YTD
15.21%
6M
15.28%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKSX vs. FIMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLKSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund
9.94%14.61%10.81%14.87%-5.16%24.70%9.32%10.74%
FIMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund
15.21%11.01%13.02%12.75%-12.08%28.21%4.74%7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKSX and FIMVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.94

The correlation between FLKSX and FIMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKSX vs. FIMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKSX
FLKSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FLKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FIMVX
FIMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FIMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FIMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKSX vs. FIMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLKSXFIMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

3.79

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

14.28

-5.35

FLKSX vs. FIMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FIMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKSX and FIMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLKSXFIMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.17

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.50

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.51

+0.18

Drawdowns

FLKSX vs. FIMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKSX drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum FIMVX drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKSX and FIMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKSXFIMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-43.61%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-7.52%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-20.40%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-21.23%

+3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-6.43%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.00%

+0.59%

Volatility

FLKSX vs. FIMVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX) have volatilities of 3.28% and 3.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLKSXFIMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.45%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

9.56%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

13.16%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

17.32%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

21.84%

-5.40%

FLKSX vs. FIMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FIMVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLKSX vs. FIMVX - Dividend Comparison

FLKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than FIMVX's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund
2.15%2.48%4.44%1.89%2.75%5.62%1.23%0.63%0.00%0.00%
FLKSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund
6.70%7.37%13.98%6.70%3.47%5.34%1.47%2.47%1.52%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLKSX and FIMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIMVX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to FLKSX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKSX dropped -36.70% vs FIMVX's -43.61%.

FIMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKSX and FIMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer