FLJP vs. UUP
FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJP returned 9.01%/yr vs 5.89%/yr for UUP. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. FLJP charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UUP.
Performance
FLJP vs. UUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return.
FLJP
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 33.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- —
UUP
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
FLJP vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 15.38% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.53% |
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 5.44% | -4.99% | 13.50% | 3.63% | 9.46% | 5.73% | -6.66% | 4.09% | 7.05% | -2.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJP and UUP is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | -0.34 |
The correlation between FLJP and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (1 year) to -0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLJP vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank
FLJP
UUP
FLJP vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLJP | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.28 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.73 | 6.26 | +2.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLJP vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and UUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJP | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -22.19% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -3.65% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -10.05% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.49% | -10.37% | -22.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -1.26% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -8.88% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 1.33% | +2.50% |
Volatility
FLJP vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that FLJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLJP | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 1.45% | +5.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 4.34% | +12.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 6.03% | +13.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 7.22% | +10.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 6.90% | +10.99% |
FLJP vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLJP vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison
FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than UUP's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.27% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% |
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 3.25% | 3.43% | 4.48% | 6.44% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.03% | 1.08% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLJP and UUP have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLJP has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs UUP's -22.19%.
On 5-year performance, FLJP leads with 9.01% vs 5.89% for UUP. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 9.01% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.
FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 3.25% for UUP.
FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while UUP is Currency. FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 0.75% for UUP.
FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLJP and UUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer