FLJP vs. MJSC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and MJSC (MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF) are both Japan Equities funds. FLJP is passively managed, while MJSC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLJP charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MJSC.

Performance

FLJP vs. MJSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF (MJSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly lower than MJSC's 22.08% return.

FLJP

• 1D: -4.00%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 15.09%
• 6M: 14.43%
• 1Y: 33.85%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: —

MJSC

• 1D: -3.44%
• 1M: -0.52%
• YTD: 22.08%
• 6M: 21.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJP vs. MJSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	15.09%	2.57%
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF	22.08%	-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and MJSC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

FLJP vs. MJSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJP

FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 53
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 53

MJSC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJP vs. MJSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF (MJSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLJP	MJSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.86	—	—

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. MJSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than MJSC's maximum drawdown of -12.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and MJSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJP	MJSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-12.63%	-19.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.00%	-3.44%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.32%	-2.94%	-6.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLJP	MJSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.84%	20.85%	-1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.95%	20.85%	-2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.88%	20.85%	-2.97%

FLJP vs. MJSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MJSC's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLJP vs. MJSC - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than MJSC's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	3.83%	5.15%	4.56%	3.00%	1.92%	2.40%	1.51%	2.26%	1.50%	0.10%
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF	0.54%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLJP and MJSC in my portfolio?

FLJP and MJSC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLJP or MJSC?

On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLJP or MJSC?

FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MJSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLJP or MJSC?

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.54% for MJSC.

What is the main difference between FLJP and MJSC?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and MUFG. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 0.85% for MJSC.