FLJP vs. IMOM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while IMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJP returned 9.03%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for IMOM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLJP charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IMOM.

Performance

FLJP vs. IMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly lower than IMOM's 18.05% return.

FLJP

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 6.40%
• YTD: 16.23%
• 6M: 17.97%
• 1Y: 32.70%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: —

IMOM

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 18.05%
• 6M: 22.47%
• 1Y: 42.66%
• 3Y*: 25.09%
• 5Y*: 8.44%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJP vs. IMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	16.23%	26.79%	6.99%	20.00%	-16.57%	0.99%	15.76%	18.99%	-14.01%	2.22%
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF	18.05%	47.20%	5.22%	9.15%	-21.92%	-0.75%	28.39%	18.26%	-23.07%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and IMOM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.70

The correlation between FLJP and IMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLJP vs. IMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLJP	IMOM
Industrials	25.4%	33.2%
Technology	19.7%	15.8%
Financial Services	16.0%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	1.7%
Communication Services	6.3%	3.9%
Healthcare	5.8%	3.3%
Basic Materials	4.9%	19.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	4.2%
Utilities	1.2%	12.4%
Energy	0.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

FLJP vs. IMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJP

FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 50
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 50

IMOM

IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 65
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJP vs. IMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLJP	IMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	2.20	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.94	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	2.75	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.62	11.57	-2.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLJP vs. IMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the IMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and IMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLJP	IMOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	2.20	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.43	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.40	+0.05

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. IMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum IMOM drawdown of -45.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and IMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJP	IMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-45.74%	+13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	-15.61%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.17%	-17.51%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-39.27%	+6.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-2.45%	+2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.37%	-14.18%	+4.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	3.70%	+0.10%

Volatility

FLJP vs. IMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is 4.11%, while Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that FLJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJP	IMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	6.44%	-2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.72%	16.74%	-2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.92%	19.50%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.75%	19.85%	-2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.79%	20.20%	-2.41%

FLJP vs. IMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IMOM's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLJP vs. IMOM - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than IMOM's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	4.43%	5.15%	4.56%	3.00%	1.92%	2.40%	1.51%	2.26%	1.50%	0.10%	0.00%
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF	2.14%	2.53%	4.52%	2.95%	6.06%	1.27%	0.59%	1.17%	0.78%	1.11%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLJP and IMOM in my portfolio?

FLJP and IMOM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLJP or IMOM?

IMOM has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to FLJP (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs IMOM's -45.74%.

Which ETF is better, FLJP or IMOM?

On 5-year performance, FLJP leads with 9.03% vs 8.44% for IMOM. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLJP or IMOM?

Over the 5-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 8.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLJP or IMOM?

FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLJP or IMOM?

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 2.14% for IMOM.

What is the main difference between FLJP and IMOM?

FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while IMOM is Momentum. FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 0.38% for IMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.