PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJP vs. FLGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLJP vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's 0.44% return.


FLJP

1D
0.33%
1M
6.40%
YTD
16.23%
6M
17.97%
1Y
32.70%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*

FLGR

1D
-1.91%
1M
3.04%
YTD
0.44%
6M
4.14%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJP vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
16.23%26.79%6.99%20.00%-16.57%0.99%15.76%18.99%-14.01%2.22%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
0.44%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and FLGR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.62

The correlation between FLJP and FLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLJP vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLJP
FLGR

Industrials

25.4%
30.5%

Technology

19.7%
13.9%

Financial Services

16.0%
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
8.2%

Communication Services

6.3%
6.3%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.8%

Basic Materials

4.9%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.3%

Utilities

1.2%
5.0%

Energy

0.9%

-

Industrials

FLJP
25.4%
FLGR
30.5%

Technology

FLJP
19.7%
FLGR
13.9%

Financial Services

FLJP
16.0%
FLGR
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FLJP
12.2%
FLGR
8.2%

Communication Services

FLJP
6.3%
FLGR
6.3%

Healthcare

FLJP
5.8%
FLGR
5.8%

Basic Materials

FLJP
4.9%
FLGR
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLJP
3.9%
FLGR
1.4%

Real Estate

FLJP
2.9%
FLGR
1.3%

Utilities

FLJP
1.2%
FLGR
5.0%

Energy

FLJP
0.9%
FLGR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLJP vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJP vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJPFLGRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

0.19

+1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

0.38

+2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.05

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

0.22

+2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.62

0.63

+7.99

FLJP vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and FLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJPFLGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

0.19

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.32

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.28

+0.17

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum FLGR drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and FLGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJPFLGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-46.21%

+13.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-14.44%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-15.53%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-43.54%

+11.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-4.26%

+4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-12.37%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

5.03%

-1.23%

Volatility

FLJP vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is 4.11%, while Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that FLJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLJPFLGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

6.23%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

14.03%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.92%

17.18%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

20.26%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.79%

21.43%

-3.64%

FLJP vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLJP and FLGR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLJP vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than FLGR's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.71%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
4.43%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLJP and FLGR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to FLJP (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs FLGR's -46.21%.

On 5-year performance, FLJP leads with 9.03% vs 6.45% for FLGR. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLJP and FLGR have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.71% for FLGR.

FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while FLGR is Europe Equities. FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index.

FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLJP and FLGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer