FLJP vs. FJP
FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and FJP (First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund) are both Japan Equities funds - FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index while FJP tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJP returned 9.03%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for FJP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLJP charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FJP.
Performance
FLJP vs. FJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly higher than FJP's 14.28% return.
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 6M
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 32.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
FJP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 33.53%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
FLJP vs. FJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 16.23% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.22% |
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 14.28% | 33.60% | 5.80% | 23.00% | -12.83% | -1.13% | 3.60% | 7.72% | -18.60% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJP and FJP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FLJP and FJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLJP vs. FJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLJP
FJP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
FLJP
FJP
Technology
FLJP
FJP
Financial Services
FLJP
FJP
Consumer Cyclical
FLJP
FJP
Communication Services
FLJP
FJP
Healthcare
FLJP
FJP
Basic Materials
FLJP
FJP
Consumer Defensive
FLJP
FJP
Real Estate
FLJP
FJP
Utilities
FLJP
FJP
Energy
FLJP
FJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLJP vs. FJP — Risk / Return Rank
FLJP
FJP
FLJP vs. FJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLJP | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.33 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 7.20 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLJP | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.63 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.53 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.32 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
FLJP vs. FJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum FJP drawdown of -41.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and FJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJP | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -41.51% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -14.43% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -17.02% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.49% | -31.88% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -6.34% | +6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -11.46% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 4.67% | -0.87% |
Volatility
FLJP vs. FJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is 4.11%, while First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that FLJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLJP | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 6.51% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.72% | 16.87% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 20.70% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 20.35% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 18.88% | -1.09% |
FLJP vs. FJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FJP's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLJP vs. FJP - Dividend Comparison
FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than FJP's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 2.49% | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 2.80% | 1.54% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 0.85% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.43% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLJP and FJP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FJP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to FLJP (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs FJP's -41.51%.
On 5-year performance, FJP leads with 10.81% vs 9.03% for FLJP. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FJP has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.
FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 2.49% for FJP.
FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while FJP tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 0.80% for FJP.
FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLJP and FJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer