FLJP vs. DIVI
FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. FLJP is passively managed, while DIVI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJP returned 9.03%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for DIVI. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLJP vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly higher than DIVI's 10.89% return.
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 6M
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 32.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 10.89%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- —
FLJP vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 16.23% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.22% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 10.89% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -6.73% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJP and DIVI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FLJP and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLJP vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLJP
DIVI
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
FLJP
DIVI
Technology
FLJP
DIVI
Financial Services
FLJP
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
FLJP
DIVI
Communication Services
FLJP
DIVI
Healthcare
FLJP
DIVI
Basic Materials
FLJP
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
FLJP
DIVI
Real Estate
FLJP
DIVI
Utilities
FLJP
DIVI
Energy
FLJP
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLJP vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FLJP
DIVI
FLJP vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLJP | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.55 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 9.83 | -1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLJP | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.82 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.88 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.67 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
FLJP vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJP | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -27.76% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -10.54% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -14.58% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.49% | -18.53% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -1.01% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -3.63% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 2.73% | +1.07% |
Volatility
FLJP vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is 4.11%, while Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that FLJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLJP | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 5.11% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.72% | 12.18% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 14.84% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 15.30% | +2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 16.46% | +1.33% |
FLJP vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLJP and DIVI have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLJP vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than DIVI's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.53% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.43% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLJP and DIVI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVI has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to FLJP (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.44% vs 9.03% for FLJP. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJP and DIVI have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.53% for DIVI.
FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLJP and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer