FLJP vs. DIEM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM).

FLJP and DIEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLJP is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. DIEM is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. It was launched on Jun 1, 2016. Both FLJP and DIEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FLJP vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLJP vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	5.02%	26.79%	6.99%	20.00%	-16.57%	0.99%	15.76%	18.99%	-14.01%	2.22%
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	5.34%	30.81%	12.29%	15.41%	-20.61%	6.92%	1.27%	12.23%	-11.29%	2.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 5.34% return.

FLJP

• 1D: 3.55%
• 1M: -8.64%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 9.34%
• 1Y: 29.58%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: —

DIEM

• 1D: 3.69%
• 1M: -8.22%
• YTD: 5.34%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 34.56%
• 3Y*: 19.05%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJP vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DIEM

Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF

FLJP

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

Return for Risk

FLJP vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJP

FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 79
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 79

DIEM

DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 89
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJP vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLJP	DIEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.88	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.51	-0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.38	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	2.79	-0.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.12	11.28	-3.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLJP vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and DIEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLJP	DIEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	1.88	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.47	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.42	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and DIEM is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FLJP vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than DIEM's 2.90% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	4.90%	5.15%	4.56%	3.00%	1.92%	2.40%	1.51%	2.26%	1.50%	0.10%	0.00%
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	2.90%	2.99%	4.92%	4.45%	6.31%	4.06%	2.75%	5.98%	3.87%	2.61%	0.35%

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and DIEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJP	DIEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-38.61%	+6.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	-12.33%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-33.34%	+0.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.71%	-9.09%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-9.86%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	3.05%	+0.46%

Volatility

FLJP vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) have volatilities of 9.24% and 9.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJP	DIEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.24%	9.47%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.34%	13.43%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.18%	18.43%	+2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	16.38%	+1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.75%	17.41%	+0.34%