FLJJ vs. GFEB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FLJJ (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF) and GFEB (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. FLJJ is actively managed, while GFEB is passively managed. Over the past year, FLJJ returned 15.88% vs 15.11% for GFEB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLJJ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GFEB.

Performance

FLJJ vs. GFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJJ achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than GFEB's 5.66% return.

FLJJ

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 5.39%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 15.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GFEB

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 5.71%
• 1Y: 15.11%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJJ vs. GFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	5.39%	11.35%	14.40%
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February	5.66%	11.19%	11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJJ and GFEB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	0.88

The correlation between FLJJ and GFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLJJ vs. GFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 92

GFEB

GFEB Risk / Return Rank: 85
GFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJJ vs. GFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLJJ	GFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.31	2.73	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.17	4.03	+1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.55	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	3.40	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.85	18.12	+3.73

FLJJ vs. GFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is comparable to the GFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJJ and GFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLJJ vs. GFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJJ drawdown since its inception was -6.91%, smaller than the maximum GFEB drawdown of -9.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJJ and GFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJJ	GFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.91%	-9.63%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.86%	-4.46%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.40%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-0.70%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	0.84%	-0.11%

Volatility

FLJJ vs. GFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) is 1.24%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that FLJJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJJ	GFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	1.68%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.76%	4.45%	-0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.83%	5.57%	-0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.19%	7.57%	-1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.19%	7.57%	-1.38%

FLJJ vs. GFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJJ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLJJ vs. GFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLJJ nor GFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLJJ and GFEB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FLJJ and GFEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLJJ or GFEB?

GFEB has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to FLJJ (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJJ dropped -6.91% vs GFEB's -9.63%.

Which ETF is better, FLJJ or GFEB?

On 1-year performance, FLJJ leads with 15.88% vs 15.11% for GFEB. On fees, FLJJ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FLJJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLJJ or GFEB?

Over the 1-year period, FLJJ has performed better with a 15.88% return vs 15.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLJJ or GFEB?

FLJJ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLJJ or GFEB?

FLJJ and GFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FLJJ and GFEB?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FLJJ and 0.85% for GFEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.