FLJH vs. IBID
FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLJH returned 39.29% vs 3.54% for IBID. Their -0.15 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLJH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
FLJH vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.35% return.
FLJH
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 1Y
- 39.29%
- 3Y*
- 27.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.50%
IBID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.06M | $1.95M | $1.54M | |
| $833.66K | $776.63K | $746.99K |
FLJH vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 20.85% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 0.06% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.35% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJH and IBID is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLJH vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
FLJH
IBID
FLJH vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLJH | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.66 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 6.46 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.82 | 22.66 | -9.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLJH vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJH | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.51% | -1.28% | -30.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -0.55% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -0.14% | -3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -0.22% | -5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 0.16% | +2.91% |
Volatility
FLJH vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that FLJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLJH | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 0.32% | +5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 0.92% | +14.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 1.15% | +18.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 2.21% | +16.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 2.21% | +17.67% |
FLJH vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLJH vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than IBID's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 2.49% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 4.90% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLJH and IBID have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLJH has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJH dropped -31.51% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, FLJH leads with 39.29% vs 3.54% for IBID. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 39.29% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBID.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.49% for FLJH.
FLJH is categorized as Japan Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJH and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLJH and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer