PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJH vs. FLEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLJH vs. FLEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLJH vs. FLEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
6.40%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
-2.81%41.56%2.26%16.21%-9.14%23.27%0.95%26.94%-8.54%-1.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than FLEU's -2.81% return.


FLJH

1D
2.17%
1M
-7.04%
YTD
6.40%
6M
13.61%
1Y
35.61%
3Y*
27.63%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*

FLEU

1D
3.62%
1M
-9.14%
YTD
-2.81%
6M
1.86%
1Y
21.11%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLJH vs. FLEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLJH and FLEU have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLJH vs. FLEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FLEU
FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJH vs. FLEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJHFLEUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

1.10

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

1.66

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

1.48

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.73

5.76

+4.97

FLJH vs. FLEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the FLEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and FLEU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJHFLEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.10

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.69

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.52

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and FLEU is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLJH vs. FLEU - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than FLEU's 2.29% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.67%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
2.29%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. FLEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, smaller than the maximum FLEU drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and FLEU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJHFLEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.51%

-33.94%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-13.41%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-18.67%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-9.92%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-4.73%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.45%

-0.22%

Volatility

FLJH vs. FLEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is 8.09%, while Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) has a volatility of 8.86%. This indicates that FLJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLJHFLEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

8.86%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

12.19%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.87%

19.25%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

15.91%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

18.16%

+1.72%