PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJH vs. FLEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLJH vs. FLEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 20.31% return, which is significantly higher than FLEU's 6.27% return.


FLJH

1D
0.71%
1M
8.59%
YTD
20.31%
6M
18.71%
1Y
46.83%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
20.80%
10Y*

FLEU

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.88%
YTD
6.27%
6M
9.17%
1Y
18.35%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJH vs. FLEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
20.31%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
6.27%41.56%2.26%16.21%-9.14%23.27%0.95%26.94%-8.54%-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and FLEU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.60

The correlation between FLJH and FLEU shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLJH vs. FLEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLJH
FLEU

Industrials

26.6%
21.0%

Technology

17.4%
14.7%

Financial Services

15.9%
24.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
8.4%

Communication Services

7.1%
3.6%

Healthcare

5.9%
5.8%

Basic Materials

4.3%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
5.2%

Real Estate

3.4%
1.2%

Utilities

1.3%
7.1%

Energy

1.0%
4.0%

Industrials

FLJH
26.6%
FLEU
21.0%

Technology

FLJH
17.4%
FLEU
14.7%

Financial Services

FLJH
15.9%
FLEU
24.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FLJH
12.8%
FLEU
8.4%

Communication Services

FLJH
7.1%
FLEU
3.6%

Healthcare

FLJH
5.9%
FLEU
5.8%

Basic Materials

FLJH
4.3%
FLEU
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

FLJH
4.2%
FLEU
5.2%

Real Estate

FLJH
3.4%
FLEU
1.2%

Utilities

FLJH
1.3%
FLEU
7.1%

Energy

FLJH
1.0%
FLEU
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLJH vs. FLEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FLEU
FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJH vs. FLEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJHFLEUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

1.08

+1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.61

1.62

+1.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.20

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

1.37

+2.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.09

4.99

+12.09

FLJH vs. FLEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the FLEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and FLEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJHFLEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

1.08

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.73

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.57

+0.18

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. FLEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, smaller than the maximum FLEU drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and FLEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJHFLEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.51%

-33.94%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.80%

-13.41%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-15.67%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-18.67%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.50%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-4.71%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.68%

-0.93%

Volatility

FLJH vs. FLEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is 3.45%, while Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that FLJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLJHFLEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

6.75%

-3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

14.38%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.98%

17.02%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

16.34%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

18.25%

+1.57%

FLJH vs. FLEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLJH and FLEU have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLJH vs. FLEU - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than FLEU's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
2.09%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.24%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLJH and FLEU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLEU has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to FLJH (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJH dropped -31.51% vs FLEU's -33.94%.

On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 20.80% vs 11.81% for FLEU. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLJH and FLEU have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.09% for FLEU.

FLJH is categorized as Japan Equities, while FLEU is Europe Equities. FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net.

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLJH and FLEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer