PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJH vs. DFJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLJH vs. DFJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 20.31% return, which is significantly higher than DFJ's 9.06% return.


FLJH

1D
0.71%
1M
8.59%
YTD
20.31%
6M
18.71%
1Y
46.83%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
20.80%
10Y*

DFJ

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.01%
YTD
9.06%
6M
12.58%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJH vs. DFJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
20.31%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
9.06%31.90%2.80%21.81%-9.00%0.38%1.29%16.98%-18.53%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and DFJ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.65

The correlation between FLJH and DFJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLJH vs. DFJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLJH
DFJ

Industrials

26.6%
27.0%

Technology

17.4%
12.6%

Financial Services

15.9%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
16.1%

Communication Services

7.1%
1.5%

Healthcare

5.9%
4.1%

Basic Materials

4.3%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
7.1%

Real Estate

3.4%
2.9%

Utilities

1.3%
1.6%

Energy

1.0%
0.6%

Industrials

FLJH
26.6%
DFJ
27.0%

Technology

FLJH
17.4%
DFJ
12.6%

Financial Services

FLJH
15.9%
DFJ
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FLJH
12.8%
DFJ
16.1%

Communication Services

FLJH
7.1%
DFJ
1.5%

Healthcare

FLJH
5.9%
DFJ
4.1%

Basic Materials

FLJH
4.3%
DFJ
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

FLJH
4.2%
DFJ
7.1%

Real Estate

FLJH
3.4%
DFJ
2.9%

Utilities

FLJH
1.3%
DFJ
1.6%

Energy

FLJH
1.0%
DFJ
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLJH vs. DFJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DFJ
DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJH vs. DFJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJHDFJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

1.65

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.61

2.34

+1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.29

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

2.07

+2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.09

6.01

+11.08

FLJH vs. DFJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the DFJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and DFJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJHDFJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

1.65

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.60

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.31

+0.44

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. DFJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, smaller than the maximum DFJ drawdown of -46.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and DFJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJHDFJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.51%

-46.00%

+14.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.80%

-13.03%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-13.03%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-29.71%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.92%

+6.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-11.15%

+5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

4.47%

-1.72%

Volatility

FLJH vs. DFJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is 3.45%, while WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that FLJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLJHDFJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

4.15%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

13.48%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.98%

16.39%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

15.89%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

16.95%

+2.87%

FLJH vs. DFJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DFJ's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLJH vs. DFJ - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than DFJ's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.44%2.68%2.46%2.43%2.62%2.07%2.59%2.24%1.89%1.60%1.76%1.23%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.24%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLJH and DFJ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFJ has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to FLJH (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJH dropped -31.51% vs DFJ's -46.00%.

On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 20.80% vs 9.51% for DFJ. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.

FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.44% for DFJ.

FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while DFJ tracks WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJH and 0.58% for DFJ.

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLJH and DFJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer